The Split Intelligentsia in Northern European Russia in 1918–20

The Split Intelligentsia in Northern European Russia in 1918–20

Sokolova Flera
Full text:
The article reveals the place of the intellectual élite – the intelligentsia – in Northern European Russia and the role it played in the Civil War that took place in the region in 1918-20. The article is based on the analysis of the latest research of Russian and foreign authors and takes into consideration various historical sources. It describes the ideological and political views, social attitudes and behaviour patterns of the intelligentsia which found itself ‘on opposite sides of the barricades’: in the area accountable to Soviet power and on the territories controlled by the anti-Bolshevik forces. It is noted that the Civil War became so bloody and large-scale partly because of participation of the politicized part of the intellectual élite in the war, as it was the intelligentsia that often became leaders and ideologists of various political parties and social movements and formed their social basis. In Northern European Russia, the sharp confrontation as well as ideological and political struggle took place due to the high concentration of anti-Bolshevik forces, mostly people migrating from the other regions, and due to an external factor, particularly presence of the allied forces. Most of the regional intelligentsia, despite their sympathy for anti-Bolshevism, showed their aspiration for cultural and creative activity in the professional field. It is shown that 1918–20 were the years that marked the significant transformation of points of view, attitudes and moods of the intelligentsia towards different political institutions that developed in the region and towards the implemented practices. Under the conditions of such a divided sociocultural space, the intelligentsia of ‘Red’ and ‘White’ North hit on the same idea that at that time there was no alternative to Bolshe-vism and Soviet power. This was due to several factors. Among other things, it was the fact that the followers of anti-Bolshevism, quite heterogeneous in their political composition, were drowning in their ideological and political struggle and conflicts that took place at all levels of power, so that they failed to ensure the constructive functioning of the regime and establish an effective dialogue with the regional intelligentsia. In turn, the concentration of forces, means and intellectual resources was ensured around the operation of Soviet power, which in turn also provided the victory of the Soviets in the Civil War.
Sokolova Flera
Doctor of Historical Sciences, Professor,
Northern (Arctic) Federal University named after M.V. Lomonosov (NArFU)
(Arkhangelsk, Russia)
Burbank, J. Intelligentsia and Revolution: Russian Views of Bolshevism, 1917–1922. New-York; Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1989. 340 p.  (date of access: 20.04.2018).
Danilov, A.A., and V.S. Memetov. Intelligentsiya provintsii v istorii i kul’ture Rossii [The In-telligentsia of a Province in the History and Culture of Russia]. Ivanovo: IvGU, 1997. 175 p. (In Russian)
D’yachkov, V.L. and L.G. Protasov. “Regional‘nye politicheskie elity na istoricheskom pere-lome 1917–1921 gg.”[Regional political élites on the historical crucial point of 1917–1921]. In 1921 god v sud’bakh Rossii i mira: ot Grazhdanskoi voiny k poslevoennomu miru i novym mezhdu-narodnym otnosheniyam  [1921 in the destinies of Russia and the world: From the Civil War to the post-war world and the new international relations: Proceedings of the international scientific con-ference], 147–50. Murmansk: MGGU, 2011. (In Russian)
Goldin, V.I. Kontrrevolyutsiya na Severe Rossii i ee krusheniye (1918–1920 gg.) [The Counter-revolution in the North of Russia and its Collapse (1918–1920)]. Vologda: Vologodskii gosu-darstvennyi  pedagogicheskii  institut, 1989. 94 p. (In Russian)
Goldin, V.I. Rossiya v grazhdanskoi voine. Ocherki noveishei istoriografii (vtoraya polovina 1980–1990-e gody) [Russia in the Civil War. Essays on the latest historiography (the second half of the 1980s – 1990s)]. Arkhangelsk: Borges, 2000. 280 p. (In Russian)
Kiselev, A.A., and Yu.N. Klimov. Murman v dni revolutsii i grazhdanskoi voiny [Murman in the days of the Revolution and Civil War]. Murmansk: Murmanskoe knizhnoe izdatel'stvo, 1977. 224 p. (In Russian)
Koltovoi, E.F. “Byvshie belye. Shagi v neizvestnost’ ” [Former ‘Whites’. Steps into the un-known]. In “1922 god v sud‘bakh Rossii i Evropeiskogo Severa: final, itogi, posledstviya grazhdan-skoi voiny v Rossii” [1922 in the destinies of Russia and the European North: The final, results and consequences of the Civil War in Russia: Proceedings of the international scientific conference], 185–89. Arkhangelsk: NArFU, 2012. (In Russian)
Kvakin, A.V. “Razvertyvanie shirokomasshtabnoi Grazhdanskoi voiny i novaya sovetskaya povsednevnost’ intelligentsii Rossii” [The unfolding of the large-scale Civil War and the new Soviet everyday life of the intelligentsia of Russia]. In 1918 god v sud‘bakh Rossii i mira: razvertyvanie shirokomasshtabnoi Grazhdanskoi voiny i mezhdunarodnoi interventsii [1918 in the destinies of Russia and the world: The unfolding of the large-scale Civil War and international intervention: Proceedings of the international scientific conference], 198–204. Arkhangelsk: Solti, 2008. (In Rus-sian)
Malakhov, R.A. “Provintsial‘noe chinovnichestvo Evropeiskogo Severa Rossii 1918-1920-kh godov. Na materialakh Arkhangelskoi i Vologodskoi gubernii” [Provincial officialdom of Northern European Russia in 1918–1920. On the materials of Arkhangelsk and Vologda Governorates]: PhD dissertation. Vologda: VoGU, 1999. 25 p. (In Russian)
Manchester, L. Holy fathers, secular sons: clergy, intelligentsia and the modern self in revolu-tionary Russia. DeKalb: Northern Illinois University Press, 2008. 288p.
Molodov, О.B. “1920 god v sud‘be pravoslaviya na Vologodchine (na materialakh periodi-cheskoi pechati)” [1920 in the fate of Orthodoxy in Vologda region (based on materials of periodi-cal press)]. In 1920 god v sud‘bakh Rossii i mira: apofeoz grazhdanskoi voiny v Rossii i ee vozdeistvie na mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya [1920 in the destinies of Russia and the world: The apotheosis of the Civil War in Russia and its impact on international relations]: Proceedings of the international conference, 144–48. Arkhangelsk: Solti, 2010. (In Russian)
Ovsyankin, E.I. Arkhangelsk: gody revolutsii i voennoi interventsii. 1917–1920 gg. [Ark-hangelsk: The years of Revolution and military intervention. 1917–1920]. Arkhangelsk: Severo-zapadnoe knizhnoe izdatel'stvo, 1987. 240 p. (In Russian)
Read, Ch. Culture and Power in Revolutionary Russia: the Intelligentsia and the Transition from Tsarism to Communism. New York: St. Martin's Press, 1990. 266 p.
Romanovsky, V.K. “1921: Rossiiskaya intelligentsiya v poiskakh natsional‘nogo primireniya” [The intelligentsia of Russia in search of national reconciliation]. In 1921 god v sud’bakh Rossii i mira: ot Grazhdanskoi voiny k poslevoennomu miru i novym mezhdunarodnym otnosheniyam [1921 in the destinies of Russia and the world: The apotheosis of the Civil War in Russia and its impact on international relations]: Proceedings of the international conference, 194–98. Arkhangelsk: MGGU, 2010.  (In Russian)
Silin, A.V. Uchitel‘stvo Evropeiskogo Severa v gody revolutsii i grazhdanskoi voiny [The teaching in the European North during the years of the Revolution and the Civil War]. PhD diss. Pomorskii gosudarstvennyi universitet, 2000. 23 p. (In Russian)
Sokolova, F.Kh. Intelligentsiya Evropeiskogo Severa Rossii: formirovanie, dinamika vzaimoot-noshenii s vlast‘yu (1917–1930-e gody) [Intellectuals of the European North of Russia: Organisation and dynamics of relations with the authorities (1917–30)]. PhD diss. Pomorskii gosudarstvennyi universitet, 2005. 632 p. (In Russian)
Stammler, H.A. Religion, Revolution and the Russian Intelligentsia, 1900–1912: The Vekhi Debate and its Intellectual Background. New York: Barnes & Noble, 1980. 221 p.
State and Society in the Russian Civil War: Explorations in Social History;  edited by Diane P. Koenker. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1989. 450 p. books?id=rhzQKk40WCIC&dq=Russian+Intelligentsia+and+Civil+War&hl=ru&source=gbs_navlinks_s (date of access: 20.04.2018).
Teterevleva, T.P Severnaya rossiiskaya emigratsiya: genezis i adaptatsionnye protsessy. 1918–1930-e gody [Northern emigration in Russia: Genesis and the processes of adaptation. 1918–1930-s]: PhD dissertation Arkhangelsk: Pomorskii gosudarstvennyi universitet, 1997. 2016 p. (In Russian)
The Almanac of the Association of the Civil War researchers of Russia; edited by  V.I. Goldin. Arkhangelsk: NArFU, 2015–17. (In Russian)
Volkov, V.S. “Russkaya intelligentsiya v Grazhdanskoi voine: pozitsii, funktsii, rol‘”[Russian intelligentsia in the Civil War: Positions, functions and role]. In Proushozhdenie i nachalnyi etap grazhdanskoi voiny. 1918 god. Materialy 2 sessii, 28–30 iyunya 1993 [Origin and the initial stage of the Civil War. 1918. Materials of the 2nd session, 28–30th June 28–1993], Part 1,  132–33. Moscow: Nauka, 1994. (In Russian)
Zimina, V.D, and Yu.D. Grazhdanov. Intelligentsiya v politicheskikh protsessakh Rossii nachala 20 veka [Intellectuals in the political processes of Russia at the beginning of the 20th century]. Volgograd: Izdatel'stvo Volgogradskoi  akademii gosudarstvennoi sluzhby, 1999. 102 p. (In Russian)
Zolotarev, O.V. “Intelligentsiya Sovetskoi Rossii v 1920-e gody” [The intelligentsia of Soviet Russia in the 1920s]. In 1917 god v sud‘bakh regionov, strany i mira: vzglyad iz 21 veka [1917 in the destinies of regions, the country and the world: A view from the 21st century]: Proceedings of the international scientific conference; edited by V.I. Goldin, 90–93. Arkhangelsk: NArFU, 2017. (In Russian)

Civil War, Northern European Russia, the intelligentsia, intellectual élite, ideological and political views, public position.
For citation:
Sokolova, F. “The Split Intelligentsia in Northern European Russia in 1918–20”. Historia Provinciae – The Journal of Regional History, vol. 2, no. 4 (2018): 51–81, 10.23859/2587-8344-2018-2-4-1

Creative Commons License<
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

ISSN 2587-8344 (Online)