The story of the death of Nicholas II and his family through the prism of source study Review of Pchelov, E.V. Tsareubiistvo 1918 goda: istochniki, voprosy, versii [The regicide of 1918: sources, questions, and versions]. Moscow: RGGU, 2020.

The historiography of the death of Russian Emperor Nicholas II, his family and retinue has been replenished with a new book. The monograph by famous historian Evgenii Pchelov The Regicide of 1918: Sources, Questions, and Versions published in 2020 by the publishing house of the Russian State University for the Humanities is based on the results of a source analysis of some issues related to the death of the members of the Russian imperial house in the Urals during the Civil War. The book consists of four sections (chapters), which respectively deal with four debatable and insufficiently studied issues within the framework of this topic. The first chapter of the book is dedicated to the mysterious fate of the documents of the White Guard investigation of the case of the murder of the tsar’s family. The author comes to the conclusion that the extant materials from different parts of the world, in general, make it possible to reconstruct the contents of eleven volumes of the case files. The second part of the work deals with the issue of interpretation of the finds made by investigator Nikolai Sokolov in the area of the Ganina Yama mine where the clothes of the victims were burned. The author disagrees with the conclusions of the White investigator about the complete destruction of the Romanovs’ remains. The third section of the book covers the controversial issue of “mysterious” inscriptions in the basement of the Ipatiev House, where the imperial family was shot. Evgenii Pchelov questions the mystical and cabbalistic background of these inscriptions, although he emphasizes that their further scientific study is necessary. In the final chapter, the author proposes a solution to the issue of whether Moscow represented by Vladimir Lenin and Yakov Sverdlov sanctioned the murder of the Romanovs in Yekaterinburg. The researcher comes to a reasonable conclusion about the presence of a tacit permission from the top Bolsheviks to destroy the tsar’s family. The review notes both positive aspects of Evgenii Pchelov’s research and some inaccurate or insufficient conclusions of the author which were caused by ignoring the previous historiography, on the one hand, and by a simplified understanding of the source-study approach as relying solely on “available sources,” on the other hand.

Avdonin, A.N. Ganina yama: istoriya poiskov ostankov tsarskoi sem'i [Ganina Yama: the history of the search for the remains of the tsar’s family]. Yekaterinburg: Real-Media, 2013. (In Russian)
Buranov, Yu.A., and V.M. Khrustalev. Ubiitsy tsarya. Unichtozhenie dinastii [The regicide. Destruction of the dynasty]. Moscow: Terra, 1997. (In Russian)
Ioffe, G.Z. Revolyutsiya i sud'ba Romanovykh [Revolution and the fate of the Romanovs]. Moscow: Respublika, 1992. (In Russian)
Knyazev, M.A. “‘Konechno, samoe-to otvetstvennoe bylo, chtoby ukryt', chtoby sledov ne ostalos'’: vospominaniya chekista I.I. Rodzinskogo o sokrytii ostankov Tsarskoi sem'i pod Ekaterinburgom v 1918 g.” [‘Surely, the most important thing was to cover it up so that there would be no traces left’: the memoirs of chekist Isai Rodzinskii about the concealment of the remains of the Tsar’s family near Yekaterinburg in 1918]. Vestnik Ekaterinburgskoi dukhovnoi seminarii, no. 34 (2021): 318–40. https://doi.org/10.24412/2224-5391-2021-34-318-340
Knyazev, M.A. “Sozhzheny ili sokryty? Sud'ba ostankov Nikolaya II i ego sem'i v zerkale slukhov: k postanovke problemy” [Burnt or hidden? The fate of the remains of Nicholas II and his family in the mirror of rumors: to the problem statement]. In Grazhdanskaya voina na vostoke Rossii: vzglyad skvoz' dokumental'noe nasledie: materialy IV Mezhdunarodnoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii, posvyashchennoi 100-letiyu Zapadno-Sibirskogo vosstaniya i 10-letiyu Tsentra izucheniya istorii Grazhdanskoi voiny (Omsk, 20–21 oktyabrya 2021 g.) [Civil War in the east of Russia: outlook through the documentary heritage: materials of the Fourth International Scientific-Practical Conference dedicated to the 100th anniversary of the West Siberian uprising and the 10th anniversary of the Center for the Study of Civil War History (Omsk, October 20–21, 2021)], edited by D.I. Petin, et al., 132–41. Omsk: OmGTU, 2021. (In Russian)
Lykova, L.A. Sledstvie po delu ob ubiistve rossiiskoi imperatorskoi sem'i. Istoriograficheskii i arkheograficheskii ocherk [Investigation into the murder of the Russian imperial family. Historiographical and archaeographical essay]. Moscow: ROSSPEN, 2007. (In Russian)
Mel'gunov, S.P. Sud'ba imperatora Nikolaya II posle otrecheniya: istoriko-kriticheskie ocherki [The fate of Emperor Nicholas II after abdication: historical and critical essays]. Moscow: Veche, 2005. (In Russian)
Mul'tatuli, P.V. Nikolai II: Doroga na Golgofu: Svidetel'stvuya o Khriste do smerti… [Nicholas II: The road to Calvary: Testifying of Christ till death…]. Moscow: AST: Astrel', 2010. (In Russian)
Obolenskii, A.A., and E.G. Agadzhanyan Tsarskaya lozh': itogi rassledovaniya [The Tsar’s lie: the findings of the investigation]. St Petersburg: Omega, 2020. (In Russian)
Pchelov, E.V. Tsareubiistvo 1918 goda: istochniki, voprosy, versii [The regicide of 1918: sources, questions, and versions], edited by A.B. Bezborodov. Moscow: RGGU, 2020. (In Russian)
Plotnikov, I.F. Pravda istorii. Gibel' Tsarskoi Sem'i [The truth of the history. Death of the Tsar’s family]. Yekaterinburg: Sverdlovskaya regional'naya obshchestvennaya organizatsiya “Za dukhovnost' i nravstvennost'”, 2003. (In Russian)
Rozanova, N.L. Tsarstvennye strastoterptsy. Posmertnaya sud'ba [Royal passion-bearers. Postmortem fate]. Moscow: Vagrius, 2008. (In Russian)
Voitikov, S.S. Uzda dlya Trotskogo. Krasnye vozhdi v gody Grazhdanskoi voiny [A bridle for Trotsky. Red leaders during the Civil War]. Moscow: AIRO-XXI, 2016. (In Russian)
Zhuk, Yu.A. Voprositel'nye znaki v ‘Tsarskom dele’ [Question marks in the ‘Tsar’s case’]. St Petersburg: BKhV-Peterburg, 2013. (In Russian)