Peer Review Form
For Reviewers

Peer Review Form

The journal Historia Provinciae – the Journal of Regional History

Peer Review

of the article (indicate article title, length in author’s sheets):

 

Discussion

Answer the questions

Yes

No

Compliance of the contents of the article with the declared branch of science and speciality

 

 

Relevance of the problem

 

 

Theoretical and practical significance of the research

 

 

Presence of the analysis of the current state of research into the problem

 

 

Scientific novelty

 

 

Personal contribution of the author into the research topic

 

 

Author’s proficiency in using scientific analysis and generalization methods

 

 

Validity of the research results and conclusions, their compliance with the contents of the publication

 

 

Compliance of the title of the article with its contents

 

 

Readability and good academic style of the text

 

 

Recommendations

Answer the questions

Yes

No

The article is recommended for publication

 

 

The articles is recommended with some stylistic amendments

 

 

The articles is recommended after revision of specific points (the remarks of the reviewer are listed below in the COMMENTS section)

 

 

The articles is not recommended; it requires considerable improvement by the author(s) (the reasons for rejection are listed below in the COMMENTS section; the reasons for rejection are not necessary to be listed if the answer to most of the questions in the DISCUSSION section is negative)

 

 

I give my consent to posting my review in a closed access form in the national bibliographic science citation database RSCI

 

 

Comments

 

 

 

date                                                                                                                               signature