The issue of the attitude of various political forces of the early 20th century to Leo Tolstoy’s doctrines remains very relevant. On the one hand, it is due to the fact that the religious and philosophical ideas of the writer are still popular among liberal politicians and intelligentsia, contributing to the growth of oppositional, pacifist, and anti-clerical sentiments in a certain part of society. On the other hand, it is due to the “conservative turn” that is taking place today in the minds of the political elite and the majority of the population. In this context, historical themes related to the history of Russian conservatism are of increased interest. In this article an attempt was made to comprehensively analyze public addresses (speeches and sermons) and written sources (brochures, articles, books, diaries) of famous representatives of the right-wing monarchist (Black Hundred) movement of the late 19th – early 20th centuries, both priests of the Orthodox Church and the laity, which contain certain judgment about Leo Tolstoy’s activities and works as well as his religio-ethical and political views. The article concludes that almost all Russian conservatives positively assessed the writer’s literary talent, noting artistic merits of his literary works. At the same time, the article notes that the right-wingers severely criticized the religious views of Leo Tolstoy, considering them heretical and agreeing with the decision of the Most Holy Synod to unchurch the writer. The majority of the right-wingers considered the “spirit of pride” to be the main reason for Leo Tolstoy’s “spiritual decline.” The writer’s religious and ethical views were especially severely condemned by the Orthodox clergy. It is worth noting that some right-wingers found a rational grain in some aspects of Tolstoy’s worldview (vegetarianism, sobriety); at the same time, they specified that they condemned the writer’s “blasphemy.” The article emphasizes that despite the harsh criticism of Tolstoyism, right-wing political organizations (parties, unions) as well as unofficial right-wing structures (circles, salons) did not manage to develop a set of measures to counter Tolstoy’s doctrines, limiting themselves to verbal criticism of Tolstoyism.
Akhmadova, T.К. “The theme of human humiliation in the Caucasian story of L.N. Tolstoy ‘Demoted’.” In Process Management and Scientific Developments, pt. 2, 111–17. Melbourne: Aus Publishers, 2021. https://doi.org/10.34660/INF.2021.97.67.015
Beasley, R. “Russia and the invention of the modernist intelligentsia.” In Geographies of modernism, edited by P. Brooker, and A. Thacker, 19–30. Abingdon: Routledge, 2005. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203392362-9
Budilovich, A.S. Slavyanskoe edinstvo [Slavic unity], compiled by Yu.V. Klimakov, edited by O.A. Platonov. Moscow: Institut russkoi tsivilizatsii, 2014. (In Russian)
Chernaya sotnya. Istoricheskaya entsiklopediya [The Black Hundred. Historical Encyclopedia], compiled by A.D. Stepanov, and A.A. Ivanov. Moscow: Kraft+, Institut russkoi tsivilizatsii, 2008. (In Russian)
Denner M.A. “Dusting off the couch (and discovering the Tolstoy connection in Shklovsky’s ‘art as device’).” The Slavic and Eastern European Journal, vol. 52, no. 3 (2008): 370–88. Corpus ID: 171256684.
Dubrovin, A.I. Za Rodinu. Protiv kramoly [For the motherland. Against sedition], compiled by D.I. Stogov, edited by O.A. Platonov. Moscow: Institut russkoi tsivilizatsii, 2011. (In Russian)
Gringmut, V.A. Ob"edinyaites', lyudi russkie! [Unite, people of Russia!], compiled by A.D. Stepanov, edited by O.A. Platonov. Moscow: Institut russkoi tsivilizatsii, 2008. (In Russian)
Iks, “Rechi konservatora. Krichashchaya fal'sh'” [Speeches of a conservative. Screaming falseness]. Grazhdanin, no. 59–60, August 13, 1909, 1–2. (In Russian)
Iks, “Rechi konservatora. O ‘prekrasnoi forme’” [Speeches of a conservative. On the “beautiful form”]. Grazhdanin, no. 38, May 28, 1909, 1. (In Russian)
Ioann Kronshtadtskii, Righteous. Predsmertnyi dnevnik [Death diary]. Moscow; St Petersburg: Otchii dom, 2003. (In Russian)
Kalmykov, A.A. Strazh nedremlyushchii i vernyi: Zhizneopisanie svyashchennomuchenika Germogena Tobol'skogo [Unslumbering and faithful watcher: Biography of Hieromartyr Hermogenes of Tobolsk]. St Petersburg: Tsarskoe delo, 2020. (In Russian)
Kireev, A.A. Uchenie slavyanofilov [The doctrine of the Slavophiles], compiled by S.V. Lebedev, and T.V. Linitskaya, edited by O.A. Platonov. Moscow: Institut russkoi tsivilizatsii, 2012. (In Russian)
Kir'yanov, Yu.I. Russkoe sobranie 1900–1917 [The Russian Assembly, 1900–1917]. Moscow: ROSSPEN, 2003. (In Russian)
Kir'yanov, Yu.I., comp. Pravye partii. Dokumenty i materialy. 1905–1917 gg. [Right-wing parties. Documents and materials. 1905–1917], 2 vols. Vol. 1, 1905–1910. Moscow: ROSSPEN, 1998. (In Russian)
Meshcherskii, V.P. “Dnevniki. Vtornik, 8 sentyabrya” [Diaries. Tuesday, September 8]. Grazhdanin, no. 67–68, September 10, 1909, 14. (In Russian)
Meshcherskii, V.P. “Dnevniki. Vtornik, 9 noyabrya” [Diaries. Tuesday, November 9], Grazhdanin, no. 43, November 14, 1910, 14. (In Russian)
Nikolaeva, E.V. “Correspondence of L.N. Tolstoy and N.N. Strakhov.” Rhema, no. 3 (2018): 15–38. https://doi.org/10.31862/2500-2953-2018-3-15-38
Nikol'skii, B.V. Sokrushit' kramolu [To crush sedition], compiled by D.I. Stogov, edited by O.A. Platonov. Moscow: Institut russkoi tsivilizatsii, 2009. (In Russian)
Nikon (Rozhdestvenskii), Archbishop. Pravoslavie i gryadushchie sud'by Rossii [Orthodoxy and Russia’s future fate], compiled by Father Yaroslav Shipov, edited by O.A. Platonov. Moscow: Institut russkoi tsivilizatsii, 2013. (In Russian)
Orekhanov, Yu.L. “Vospriyatie konflikta mezhdu Russkoi pravoslavnoi tserkov'yu i L.N. Tolstym sovremennikami pisatelya v Rossii” [Perception of the conflict between the Russian Orthodox Church and Leo Tolstoy by the writer’s contemporaries in Russia]. Vestnik Vyatskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, no. 2–1 (2011): 30–38. (In Russian)
Paskhalov, K.N. Russkii vopros [Russian issue], compiled by D.I. Stogov, edited by O.A. Platonov. Moscow: Algoritm, 2009. (In Russian)
Politicheskie partii Rossii. Konets XIX – pervaya tret' ХХ veka [Political parties in Russia. The late 19th – the first third of the 20th century]. Moscow: ROSSPEN, 1996. (In Russian)
Pravoslavnaya tserkov' i russkii natsionalizm (vtoraya polovina XIX – nachalo XX veka) [Orthodox Church and Russian nationalism (second half of the 19th – early 20th centuries)], edited by A.A. Ivanov, compiled by A.A. Ivanov, I.V. Ambartsumov, V.V. Kalinovskii, A.E. Kotov, and A.A. Chemakin. St Petersburg: Vladimir Dal', 2021. (In Russian)
Sizova, I.I. “Narodnyi teatr L.N. Tolstogo: nachalo prosvetitel'skogo sluzheniya pisatelya” [Leo Tolstoy’s popular theatre: the beginning of the writer’s educational service]. Studia Litterarum, is. 1, no. 3–4 (2016): 216–34. https://doi.org/10.22455/2500-4247-2016-1-3-4-216-234 (In Russian)
Stepanov, A.D. Russkaya ideya. XXI vek [Russian Idea. 21st Century]. Moscow: [n.p.], 2021. (In Russian)
Stepanov, S.A. Chernaya sotnya. Chto oni sdelali dlya velichiya Rossii [The Black Hundred. What they did for the greatness of Russia]. Moscow: Yauza-press, 2013. (In Russian)
Svyatye chernosotentsy. Svyashchennyi Soyuz Russkogo Naroda [Holy Black Hundreds. Holy Union of the Russian People], compiled by A.D. Stepanov, edited by O.A. Platonov. Moscow: Institut russkoi tsivilizatsii, 2011. (In Russian)
Velichko, V.L. Russkie rechi [Russian speeches], compiled by A.D. Stepanov, edited by O.A. Platonov. Moscow: Institut russkoi tsivilizatsii, 2010. (In Russian)
Keywords:
Russian Empire, Leo Tolstoy, Tolstoyism, intelligentsia, right-wingers, Black Hundreds, monarchists, Russian Assembly, Union of the Russian People, sectarianism
For citation:
Stogov, D.I. “Russian monarchists of the late 19th – early 20th centuries about Leo Tolstoy.” Historia Provinciae – the Journal of Regional History, vol. 6, no. 3 (2022): 796–841, https://doi.org/10.23859/2587-8344-2022-6-3-2