The article analyzes the influence of the experience of service as vice-governor on the subsequent gubernatorial appointment during the ministry of P. Stolypin. The framework of the study was determined by the following tasks: to identify the personnel traditions that had developed in the Ministry of Internal Affairs in relation to the position of vice-governor, to determine the importance of the vice-governor’s position under P. Stolypin, to quantitatively analyze the relationship between the gubernatorial and vice-gubernatorial positions, to identify the factors that negatively influenced the gubernatorial appointment, and to analyze the relationship with the current governor, considered as a factor of subsequent appointment. The geographical scope of the study covers the governorates of European Russia that were ruled in compliance with the General Governorate Regulations and included a total of 49 governorates except for the Don Host Oblast. As a result of quantitative analysis, it was found that slightly more than half of the vice-governors became governors. It was determined that in the personnel policy of Stolypin’s ministry, the position of vice-governor played the role of a “transitional stage,” but not all governors went through it in their careers and not all vice-governors became governors. This approach was characteristic not only of Stolypin’s ministry but also of the previous ministries. The position of vice-governor made it possible to gain the necessary administrative experience before an independent gubernatorial appointment and build candidate pool to be appointed governors. Among the negative factors identified in connection with the vice-governor’s position were low professional training often disguised by a long term of service and a tendency to conflict with immediate superiors. Their identification allowed making the right decision and not to appoint an unsuitable official to the gubernatorial position. Some officials received the governor’s position bypassing the vice-governor’s appointment, which was facilitated by the following factors: patronage, high professional qualities of the officials, and situational necessity, which prevailed over the informally established order. Each appointment represented a unique combination of these parameters and the final answer to how an official received the governor’s position can only be given by an individual microanalysis of each situation.
Borshchevskii, G.A. “Sistema upravleniya byurokratiei v dorevolyutsionnoi, sovetskoi i sovremennoi Rossii” [The Management system of bureaucracy in tsarist, soviet and modern Russia]. Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta. Istoriya, vol. 65, iss. 1 (2020): 61–84. https://doi.org/10.21638/11701/spbu02.2020.104 (In Russian)
Garbuz, G.V. “Pervye litsa gubernskoi administratsii: osobennosti vzaimodeistviya v kontse XIX – nachale XX v.” [The first persons of the provincial administration: The features of interaction in the late 19th – early 20th century]. Izvestiya vysshikh uchebnykh zavedenii. Povolzhskii region. Gumanitarnye nauki = University proceedings. Volga region. Humanities, no. 4 (2021):
24–34. https://doi.org/10.21685/2072-3024-2021-4-3 (In Russian)
Garbuz, G.V. “Sotsiokul'turnyi oblik vysshei provintsial'noi byurokratii v Povolzh'e v nachale XX v.” [Sociocultural appearance of the highest provincial bureaucracy in the Volga region at the beginning of the 20th century]. Vestnik Penzenskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, no. 2 (10) (2015): 4–8. (In Russian)
Gokmen, G., and D. Kofanov. “Career Incentives in Political Hierarchy: Evidence from Imperial Russia.” European Review of Economic History, vol. 24, iss. 2 (2020): 264–87.
Gorak, A.G. “Seks, lozh' i kar'era. Pikantnye motivy iz zhizni rossiiskikh sanovnikov”
[Sex, lies and career. Piquant motifs of the lives of Russian dignitaries]. Vestnik
Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta. Istoriya, vol. 66, iss. 3 (2021): 755–70. https://doi.org/10.21638/11701/spbu02.2021.305 (In Russian)
Grebenkin, I.N. “Voennaya byurokratiya i voennye byurokraty: ot Rossiiskoi imperii k Respublike Sovetov” [Military bureaucracy and military bureaucrats: From Russian Empire to Soviet Republic]. Noveishaya istoriya Rossii = Modern History of Russia, vol. 10, no. 2 (2020): 297–314. https://doi.org/10.21638/11701/spbu24.2020.202 (In Russian)
Hamburg, G.M. The Politics of the Russian Nobility, 1881–1905. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press, 1984.
Kabytov, P.S., and E.P. Barinova. “Petr Arkad'evich Stolypin i rossiiskoe dvoryanstvo” [Pyotr A. Stolypin and the Russian Nobility]. Vestnik Volgogradskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya 4: Istoriya. Regionovedenie. Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya, vol. 24, no. 3 (2019): 79–91. https://doi.org/10.15688/jvolsu4.2019.3.7 (In Russian)
Lovtsov, V.A. “Kar'ernaya dinamika gubernatorov Rossiiskoi imperii 1906–1911 gg.” [Career dynamics of the governors of the Russian Empire in 1906–1911]. Vestnik Tambovskogo universiteta. Seriya: Gumanitarnye nauki, vol. 27, no. 1 (2022): 189–200. https://doi.org/10.20310/1810-0201-2022-27-1-189-200 (In Russian)
Lysenko, L.M. Gubernatory i general-gubernatory Rossiiskoi imperii (XVIII – nachalo XX veka) [Governors and Governors-General of the Russian Empire (18th – early 20th century)]. Moscow: Izdatel'stvo MPGU, 2001. (In Russian)
Lyubichankovskii, S.V. “Gubernskie administratsii Urala v 1895–1913 godakh: sotsiokul'turnyi aspect” [Provincial administrations of the Urals in 1895–1913: Sociocultural aspect]. Vestnik Evrazii, no. 2 (32) (2006): 75–94. (In Russian)
Minakov, A.S. Gubernatorskii korpus i tsentral'naya vlast': problema vzaimootnoshenii (po materialam gubernii Chernozemnogo tsentra vtoroi poloviny XIX – nachala XX v.) [The governor’s corps and the central government: The problem of relationships (based on the materials of the provinces of the Central Black Earth region in the second half of the 19th – early 20th century]. Orel: Orlik, 2011. (In Russian)
Mosse, W.E. “Russian Provincial Governors at the End of the Nineteenth Century.” The Historical Journal, vol. 27, iss. 1 (1984): 225–39.
Raskin, D.I. “Formirovanie vysshei byurokraticheskoi elity v Rossiiskoi imperii XIX – nachala XX veka: obrazovanie i professional'naya kvalifikatsiya” [Establishment of highest bureaucratic elite in the Russian Empire in the 19th – early 20th century: Education and professional qualifications]. Nauchnyi dialog, no. 4 (2021): 410–22. https://doi.org/10.24224/2227-1295-2021-4-410-422 (In Russian)
Robbins, R. The Tsar’s Viceroys: Russian Provincial Governors in the Last Years of the Empire. Ithaca, NY; London: Cornell University Press, 1987.
Semenova, N.L., and S.V. Lyubichankovskii. “Orenburgskie vitse-gubernatory v pervoi polovine XIX veka: funktsii, polnomochiya, personal'nyi sostav i faktory kar'ery” [The Orenburg vice-governors in the first half of the 19th century: Functions, authority, personal information, and career factors]. Novyi istoricheskii vestnik, no. 1 (59) (2019): 20–41. https://doi.org/10.24411/2072-9286-2019-00002 (In Russian)
Shatokhin, I.T. “Kurskie vitse-gubernatory: opyt rekonstruktsii sluzhebnoi kar'ery” [Kursk vice-governors: Experience in reconstruction of service career]. Via in tempore. History and Political Science, vol. 49, no. 2 (2022): 375–84. https://doi.org/10.52575/2687-0967-2022-49-2-375-384 (In Russian)
Smirnova, A.A. “Organizatsiya vzaimodeistviya gubernatorov, vitse-gubernatorov i pravitelei kantselyarii v kontse XIX – nachale XX v. v Vyatskoi gubernii” [Organization of interaction of governors, vice-governors and heads of the office in the late 19th – early 20th century in Vyatka Governorate]. Vestnik Vyatskogo gosudarstvennogo gumanitarnogo universiteta, no. 3 (1) (2012): 58–61. (In Russian)
Solov'ev, K.A. “Zemtsy i vysshaya byurokratiya v nachale XX veka: ‘my’ i ‘oni’” [Local government workers and superior bureaucracy at the beginning of the 20th century: “We” and “them”]. Vestnik Novosibirskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Istoriya, filologiya, vol. 14, iss. 1 (2015): 106–18. (In Russian)
Tyurin, V.A. “Samarskie vitse-gubernatory vtoroi poloviny XIX v.: vlastnye polnomochiya, sotsiokul'turnaya kharakteristika” [Samara vice-governors of the second half of the 19th century: Powers, socio-cultural characteristics]. Vestnik Samarskogo universiteta. Istoriya, pedagogika, filologiya, vol. 29, no. 1 (2023): 46–52. https://doi.org/10.18287/2542-0445-2023-29-1-46-52 (In Russian)
Zaionchkovskii, P.A. Pravitel'stvennyi apparat samoderzhavnoi Rossii v XIX v. [Government apparatus of autocratic Russia in the 19th century]. Moscow: Mysl', 1978. (In Russian)
Keywords:
vice-governors, bureaucracy, personnel policy, provincial administration, P. Stolypin, Russian Empire
For citation:
Lovtsov, V.A., and S.K. Lyamin. “The Importance of the Position of Vice-Governor in the Personnel Policy of P. Stolypin’s Ministry (1906–1911).” Historia Provinciae – the Journal of Regional History, vol. 8, no. 3 (2024): 866–97, https://doi.org/10.23859/2587-8344-2024-8-3-4; EDN: LNZWEY