THE JOURNAL OF REGIONAL HISTORY V.6 No.2
Ukrainian foreign policy expertise and Russia’s military security in the Black Sea region
THE JOURNAL OF REGIONAL HISTORY V.6 No.2

Ukrainian foreign policy expertise and Russia’s military security in the Black Sea region

Authors:
Oleg V. Onopko
DOI:
Full text:
This article is the first attempt in political science to determine the specifics of potential influence on Russia’s military security that may be exerted by the existing views on Russia and on the Black Sea region in the geopolitical worldview of the experts from the main Ukrainian think-tanks engaged in Russian and Black Sea studies. Using synthetic methodology based on certain principles and provisions of critical geopolitics, the theory of epistemic communities by Peter Haas, and securitization theory by Barry Buzan and Olle Wæver, the author studied the texts of analytical products of the institutions of foreign policy expertise that appeared in Ukraine in 2014–20. This allowed the author to establish securitized perceptions of Russia and the Black Sea region, typical for Ukrainian experts. The study of their recommendations to Ukrainian state authorities provided an opportunity to determine the potential threats to the military security of Russia. In order to understand how securitized perceptions and expert recommendations are considered by the ruling regime in Ukraine, the texts of Ukrainian military and foreign policy doctrines and strategies (approved or under discussion in 2014–21) were analyzed. All this allowed the author to come to a number of conclusions regarding the provision of Russia’s military security in the Black Sea region. It has been established that a whole pool of institutions of foreign policy expertise is engaged in Russian and Black Sea studies in Ukraine, and this pool of institutions has all the signs of an epistemic community. Its members broadcast to the Ukrainian authorities the irrational securitized ideas about Russia contained in their geopolitical worldview. They describe Russian foreign and defense policy through the desire for expansion and restoration of the Soviet Union as well as through xenophobic anti-Russian political myths. With this, these experts justify the measures that are absolutely realistic in their essence and, firstly, are aimed at creating an anti-Russian collective security system in the Black Sea region, and secondly, can lead to an armed conflict in the region with the participation of the states outside the Black See region.
Oleg V. Onopko
Candidate of Political Sciences (PhD), Associate Professor
Donetsk national University, Donetsk, Donetsk People's Republic
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5569-8256
onopko.oleg@gmail.com
Albert M., and B. Buzan. “Securitization, sectors and functional differentiation.” Security Dialogue, no. 42 (4–5) (2011): 413–25. https://doi.org/10.1177/0967010611418710
Alexandrov, O., A. Filipenko, and R. Vlasenko. Rosіis'ka polіtyka v Chornomors'komu rehіonі: zagrozy i vyklyky dlya Ukraїny: analіtychna dopovіd'. [Russian policy in the Black Sea region: threats and challenges for Ukraine: an analytical report]. Kiev: NІSD, 2020. (In Ukrainian)
Alexandrova-Arbatova, N. “Security relations in the Black Sea Region: Russia and the West after the Ukrainian crisis.” Southeast European and Black Sea studies, no. 15 (2) (2015): 129–39. https://doi.org/10.1080/14683857.2015.1060015
Baranov, A.V. “Geopoliticheskii konflikt v Kerchenskom prolive i Azovskom more: prichiny, interesy uchastnikov, dinamika” [Geopolitical conflict in the Kerch Strait and the Sea of Azov: causes, interests of participants, dynamics]. Kaspiiskii region: politika, ekonomika, kul'tura, no. 1 (58) (2019): 89–94. (In Russian)
Baranov, A.V. “Izmeneniya geopoliticheskogo balansa sil v Prichernomor'e v usloviyakh vossoedineniya Kryma s Rossiei” [Changes in the geopolitical balance of power in the Black Sea region in the context of the reunification of Crimea with Russia]. Geopolitika i ekogeodinamika regionov, vol. 4 (14), no. 2 (2018): 5–18. (In Russian)
Bogdanova, O., and A. Makarychev, eds. Baltic-Black Sea regionalisms. Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland AG, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-24878-9
Budzovych, Yu. “HUAM v konteksti zabezpechennya bezpeky ta spivrobitnytstva Chornomors'koho rehionu” [GUAM in the context of security and cooperation of the Black Sea region]. Visnyk Prykarpats'koho universytetu. Seriya: Politologiya, no. 9 (2015): 80–88. (In Ukrainian)
Churakov, D.O. “‘Voiny pamyati’ i lokal'nye konflikty sovremennosti” [‘Memory Wars’ and local conflicts of our time]. In Prepodavanie voennoi istorii v Rossii i za rubezhom: sbornik statei [Teaching military history in Russia and abroad: a collection of articles], edited by K.A. Pakhalyuk, 421–31. St Petersburg: Nestor-Istoriya, 2018. (In Russian)
Cross, S. “NATO–Russia security challenges in the aftermath of Ukraine conflict: managing Black Sea security and beyond.” Southeast European and Black Sea Studies, no. 15 (2) (2015): 151–77. https://doi.org/10.1080/14683857.2015.1060017
Fedorchuk, O. “Nederzhavni analitychni tsentry Ukrayiny yak sehment politychnoyi nauky” [Non-governmental analytical centers of Ukraine as a segment of political science]. Visnyk L'vivs'koho universytetu. Seriya: Filosofs'ko-politolohichni studiyi, no. 10 (2017): 182–87. (In Ukrainian)
Fokin, I.A. “Institutsional'naya infrastruktura politicheskoi nauki v sovremennoi Ukraine” [The institutional infrastructure of political science in modern Ukraine]. Politicheskaya nauka, no. 3, Sotsial'nye i politicheskie funktsii akademicheskikh i ekspertnykh soobshchestv [Social and political functions of academic and expert communities] (2015): 252–66. (In Russian)
Gavrila, A. “Rol' Chernomorskogo regiona v regional'nom i global'nom kontekste” [The role of the Black Sea region in the regional and global context]. Istoricheskaya i sotsial'no-obrazovatel'naya mysl', vol. 9, no. 1–2 (2017): 44–47. (In Russian)
Horyunova, Ye.O. “Aneksiya Krymu yak zahroza bezpetsi Balto-Chornomors'koho rehionu” [Annexation of Crimea as a threat to the security of the Baltic-Black Sea region]. Intermarum: istoriya, polityka, kul'tura, no. 4 (2017): 8–17. (In Ukrainian)
Gudev, P.A. “Novye riski i ugrozy bezopasnosti Rossii v Azovo-Chernomorskom regione” [New risks and threats to Russia’s security in the Azov-Black Sea region]. Puti k miru i bezopasnosti, no. 2 (53) (2017): 37–45. (In Russian)
Haas, P.M. “Introduction: epistemic communities and international policy coordination.” International Organization, vol. 46, no. 1, Knowledge, power, and international policy coordination (1992): 1–35.
Horbulin, V.P. “Svitova hibrydna viina: ukrayins'kii front” [The world hybrid war: Ukrainian forefront]. Kiev: NISD, 2017. (In Ukrainian)
Horbulin, V.P., O.S. Vlasyuk, and S.V. Kononenko. “Rosіis'ko-ukrayins'ka vіina v termіnakh teorіyi realіzmu” [Russian-Ukrainian war in terms of the theory of realism]. Suspіl'no-polіtychnі protsesy, no. 2 (2016): 70–96. (In Ukrainian)
Horbulin, V.P., O.S. Vlasyuk, E.M. Lіbanova, and O.M. Lyashenko. “Zbroinyi konflіkt v Ukrayinі u termіnakh heopolіtyky” [Armed conflict in Ukraine in terms of geopolitics]. Suspіl'no-polіtychnі protsesy, no. 3 (2016): 61–86. (In Ukrainian)
Irkhin, A.A., and O.A. Moskalenko. “Chernomorsko-Sredizemnomorskii region v sovremennoi zapadnoi analitike” [The Mediterranean and Black Sea region in modern Western analytics]. In Gumanitarnye chteniya “Sevastopol'skaya gavan'”: materialy nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii, Sevastopol', 20–21 sentyabrya 2019 goda [Humanitarian readings ‘Sevastopol Harbor’: Proceedings of the scientific practical conference, Sevastopol, September 20–21, 2019], edited by E.A. Barmina, 319–24. Sevastopol: SevGU 2019). (In Russian)
Irkhin, A.A., L.P. Nelina, and I.A. Chikharev, “Rossiya i Bol'shoe Sredizemnomor'e (1920–2014)” [Russia and the Mediterranean macro-region (1920–2014)]. Paradigmy istorii i obshchestvennogo razvitiya, no. 12 (2018): 58–68. (In Russian)
Ishin, A.V. “O geopoliticheskoi situatsii v Chernomorskom regione: krymskii vzglyad” [On the geopolitical situation in the Black Sea region: a Crimean view]. Problemy postsovetskogo prostranstva, no. 1 (7) (2016): 38–46. (In Russian)
Ishin, A.V. “O geopoliticheskoi strategii NATO v Chernomorskom basseine” [On the geopolitical strategy of NATO in the Black Sea basin]. Problemy postsovetskogo prostranstva, vol. 7, no. 2 (2020): 219–26. (In Russian)
Islyamova, E.E. “Chernomorskii region v kontekste politiki natsional'noi bezopasnosti Rossiiskoi Federatsii: voprosy teorii” [The Black Sea region in the context of the National Security policy of the Russian Federation: theory issues]. Nauchnye vedomosti Belgorodskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Istoriya. Politologiya, vol. 46, no. 2 (2019): 375–83. (In Russian)
Kayser, S. “Geopolitics of the Black Sea.” Maritime security center of excellence. Accessed May 11, 2021. https://www.marseccoe.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/Geopolitics-of-the-Black-Sea.pdf
Khrustalev, M.A. Analiz mezhdunarodnykh situatsii i politicheskaya ekspertiza: ocherki teorii i metodologii [Analysis of international situations and political expertise: essays on theory and methodology]. Moscow: NOFMO, 2008. (In Russian)
Kolosov, V.A. “Kriticheskaya geopolitika: osnovy kontseptsii i opyt ee primeneniya v Rossii” [Critical geopolitics: Fundamentals of the concept and experience of its application in Russia]. Politicheskaya nauka, no. 4, Regional'noe izmerenie politicheskogo protsessa [Regional dimension of the political process] (2011): 31–52. (In Russian)
Konyshev, V.N. “Bezopasnost' v Chernomorskom regione v otsenkakh ‘mozgovykh tsentrov’ SShA” [Security in the Black Sea region in the estimates of ‘think tanks’ of the United States]. In Chernomorsko-Sredizemnomorskii region v sisteme natsional'nykh interesov Rossii: istoriya i sovremennost': k 80-letiyu nachala Velikoi Otechestvennoi voiny: materialy Mezhdunarodnoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii [Black Sea-Mediterranean region in the system of national interests of Russia: history and modernity: to the 80th anniversary of the Great Patriotic War: Proceedings of the international scientific and practical conference], edited by A.V. Baranov and V.V. Kas'yanov, 32–35. Krasnodar: Kubanskii gosudarstvennyi universitet, 2021. (In Russian)
Kudryachenko, A.І., V.O. Shved, V.V. Soloshenko, and S.G. Samoilenko. Mіzhnarodnі aspekti іntehratsіyi Donbasu і Krymu v polіtyko-pravovyi і sotsіokul'turnyi prostіr Ukrayiny: analіtychna dopovіd' [International aspects of the integration of Donbas and Crimea in the political, legal and socio-cultural space of Ukraine: an analytical report]. Kiev: DU “Іnstytut vsesvіtn'oyi іstorіyi NAN Ukrayiny”, 2019. (In Ukrainian)
Kurylev, K.P., K.V. Gavrikova, and E.A. Pospelova. “Ekspertno-analiticheskie tsentry na Ukraine: kharakter i osobennosti” [Expert think tanks in Ukraine: format and features]. Vestnik RUDN. Seriya: Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya, vol. 15, no. 3 (2015): 99–109. (In Russian)
Lytvynenko, O. “Chornomors'ka bezpeka: osnovni trendy 2030” [Black Sea security: main trends 2030]. National Institute for Strategic Studies. Accessed June 14, 2021. https://niss.gov.ua/sites/default/files/2020-09/bsr-ukr.pdf (In Ukrainian)
Malyshev D.V. “Kerchenskii krizis i status Azovskogo morya” [The Kerch Crisis and the status of the Sea of Azov]. Postsovetskie issledovaniya, vol. 2, no. 2 (2019): 982–89. (In Russian)
Marten, K. “NATO enlargement: evaluating its consequences in Russia.” International politics, no. 57 (2020): 401–26. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41311-020-00233-9
Mayevs’ka, O. “Dіyal'nіst' ‘mozkovikh tsentrіv’ na suchasnomu etapі: zahrozy ta vikliky” [Activities of think tanks at the current stage: threats and challenges]. Vіsnyk L'vіvs'kogo unіversytetu. Serіya: Filosofs'ko-politolohichni studiyi, no. 26 (2019): 145–51. https://doi.org/10.30970/2307-1664.2019.26.18 (In Ukrainian)
Minenkova, P.V. “Kontseptual'nі zasady ta katehorіal'ne vyznachennya ponyattya ‘mozkovі tsentry’: naukove pereosmislennya tradytsіinykh pіdkhodіv” [Conceptual principles and categorical definition of the concept of think tanks: a scientific rethinking of traditional approaches]. Vіsnyk Natsіonal'nogo tekhnіchnoho unіversytetu Ukrayini ‘Kyyivs'kii polіtekhnіchnyi іnstytut’. Seriya: Polіtolohіya. Sotsіolohіya. Pravo, no.1 (2018): 17–22. https://doi.org/10.20535/2308-5053.2018.1(37).152816 (In Ukrainian)
Naumescu, V. “NATO in the Black Sea region: unpredictability and different levels of commitment among the three coastal allies.” The journal of cross-regional dialogues, special issue (2020): 131–52. https://doi.org/10.25518/2593-9483.141
Nuryshev, G.N. “Sovremennoe Prichernomor'e v geopoliticheskom izmerenii” [Modern Black Sea coast: geopolitical dimension]. Natsional'naya bezopasnost' i strategicheskoe planirovanie, no. 2–2 (14) (2016): 16–21. (In Russian)
Oliinyk, Ye.Yu. “Rol' analitychnykh nederzhavnykh politolohichnykh tsentriv Ukrayiny v rozvytku politychnoyi nauky” [The role of Ukrainian non-governmental political science think tanks in the development of political science]. Hileya, no. 51 (2011): 473–78. (In Ukrainian)
Parahons'kii, B.O. “Rehional'ni naslidky hlobal'nykh superechnostei: Chornomors'kyi rehion” [Regional consequences of global contradictions: the Black Sea region]. Stratehichna panorama: Naukovo-praktychnyi zhurnal, no. 2 (2016): 10–16. (In Ukrainian)
Parahons'kii, B.O. Systemna kryza mizhnarodnoyi bezpeky: Blyz'koskhidno-Chornomors'kyi prostir: analіtychna dopovіd' [Systemic crisis of international security: Middle East and Black Sea region: an analytical report]. Kiev: NISD, 2016. (In Ukrainian)
Parahons'kii, B.O., and G.M. Yavors’ka. Ontolohiya viiny i myru: bezpeka, stratehiya, smysl: monohrafiya [The ontology of war and peace: security, strategy, meaning: a monograph]. Kiev: NISD, 2019. (In Ukrainian)
Petrov, V.P. “Geopoliticheskoe znachenie Kryma” [Geopolitical significance of Crimea]. Vestnik RUDN. Seriya: Politologiya, vol. 20, no. 1 (2018): 21–30. (In Russian)
Plyushch, O. “Prosuvannya ekspertnymy orhanizatsiyamy dyskursu politychnykh sub''yektiv” [Promotion of the discourse of political subjects by expert organizations]. Sotsial'na psykholohiya, no. 1–2 (51–52) (2012): 204–14. (In Ukrainian)
“Rosiys'kyi sprut u diyi. Keis ‘Ukrayina’” [Russian octopus in action. Case ‘Ukraine’]. Geostrategy. Accessed June 14, 2021. https://geostrategy.org.ua/analityka/doslidzhennya/rosiyskyy-sprut-u-diyi-keys-ukrayina/zavantazhyty-doslidzhennya-rosiyskyy-sprut-u-diyi-keys-ukrayina. (In Ukrainian)
Rubanov, V.V. “Institutsionalizatsiya – bazovoe ponyatie kharakteristiki protsessa stanovleniya i razvitiya politicheskoi analitiki v Ukraine” [Institutionalization as the basic concept of the characteristics of the process of political analytics formation and development in Ukraine]. Visnyk Natsional'noho universytetu ‘Yurydychna akademiya Ukrayiny imeni Yaroslava Mudroho.’ Seriya: Filosofiya, filosofiya prava, politolohiya, sotsiolohiya, no. 4 (14) (2012): 165–69. (In Russian)
Rzhevs'ka, N. “‘Mozkovi tsentry’ yak sub''yekty ekspertnoho seredovyshcha: funktsional'nyi analiz” [‘Think tanks’ as subjects of the expert environment: a functional analysis]. Politychnyi menedzhment, no. 1–2 (2012): 161–69. (In Ukrainian)
Samus', M. “TsDAKR: Rosiis'ka ahresiya v Kerchens'kii prototsi – test dlya suchasnoyi systemy mizhnarodnykh vidnosyn” [CACDS: Russian aggression in the Kerch Strait – a test for the modern system of international relations]. Center for Army Conversion and Disarmament Studies. Accessed June 14, 2021. https://cacds.org.ua/?p=4886 (In Ukrainian)
Sanders, D. Maritime power in the Black Sea. 1st ed. London: Routledge, 2014. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315593920
Shelest, G. “Chornomors'ka bezpeka: spromozhnosti susidiv Ukrayiny na mori. Analitychna zapyska” [Black Sea security: capabilities of Ukraine’s neighbors at sea. An analytical note]. Ukrainian prism. Accessed June 14, 2021. http://prismua.org/03-02-2021/ (In Ukrainian)
Shelest, G. “Chy isnuye chornomors'ka polityka NATO?” [Is there a Black Sea policy for NATO?]. Ukrainian prism. Accessed June 14, 2021. http://prismua.org.tilda.ws/blackseanato#rec246964356 (In Ukrainian)
Shelest, G. “Chy isnuye chornomors'ka stratehiya NATO?” [Is there a Black Sea strategy for NATO?]. Ukrainian prism. Accessed June 14, 2021. http://prismua.org.tilda.ws/blackseanato (In Ukrainian)
Solodkii, V.A. “Fond imeni Razumkova kak instrument politiki ‘myagkoi sily’ Zapada na Ukraine” [The Razumkov Foundation as an instrument of Western ‘soft power’ policy in Ukraine]. Prichernomor'e. Istoriya, politika, kul'tura, no. 23 (2017): 53–57. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1164053 (In Russian)
Vlasyuk, O.S., and S.V. Kononenko. Kremlivs'ka ahresiya proty Ukrayiny: rozdumy v konteksti viiny [Kremlin aggression against Ukraine: reflections in the context of the war]. Kiev: NISD, 2017. (In Ukrainian)
Wæver, O. “Securitization and desecuritization”. In On Security, edited by Ronnie D. Lipschutz, 46–86. New York: Columbia University Press, 1995.
Yurchenko, I.V. “Geopoliticheskie osobennosti Chernomorskogo regiona v kontekste obespecheniya bezopasnosti Yuga Rossii” [Geopolitical features of the Black Sea region in the context of ensuring the security of the South of Russia]. Vestnik RUDN. Seriya: Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya, no. 3 (2008): 18–24. (In Russian)
Keywords:
foreign policy expertise, think tanks, military security, geopolitical worldview, Russia, Ukraine, Black Sea region
For citation:
Onopko, O.V. “Ukrainian foreign policy expertise and Russia’s military security in the Black Sea region.” Historia Provinciae – the Journal of Regional History, vol. 6, no. 2 (2022): 485–538. https://doi.org/10.23859/2587-8344-2022-6-2-4

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

ISSN 2587-8344 (Online)